Smartling alternative for WordPress: Why Smartling is simply too expensive for many websites

You want to make your WordPress website multilingual – clean, brand-compliant, without the copy-and-paste hell. So you look at enterprise translation platforms like Smartling. At first glance, it sounds „professional“: workflows, translation memory, approvals, automation.

An illustration featuring a system of red and blue pipes connects various national flags. It symbolises a Smartling alternative for a WordPress translation plugin.

And then comes the offer.

Suddenly, „we'll translate a few pages“ becomes a budget item that feels like a dedicated project team – every month. For many SME websites, this isn't „too expensive because it's a luxury,“ but too expensive because it scales beyond what is needed.

If you are at this point, you are probably looking for a Smartling Alternative: a solution that neatly replicates WordPress – but remains economical.

In this article, I will show you:

  • Why Smartling often tips the balance economically in the WordPress context
  • What typical cost traps do we see time and time again?
  • How to tell if you are wasting money unnecessarily
  • What a useful Smartling alternative must be able to do, at a minimum

 

There is a significantly cheaper setup option that we regularly implement at Superblau and which, under the right conditions, can save five-figure sums per year.

Why you need a Smartling alternative in the first place (WordPress reality vs. enterprise tool)

Smartling is powerful when you...

  • have a lot of languages (10+),
  • you need multiple teams and approval processes,
  • Continuously translate huge amounts of content (help centre, app strings, product catalogues).,
  • need complex integrations and role models.

 

However: Many WordPress websites are different. Typical examples are:

  • 20–200 pages of core content (home page, services, case studies, blog)
  • 1–3 languages
  • a small marketing team (or agency)
  • Updates in waves instead of a „24/7 content machine“

 

In this exact setup, the following often happens:
You pay for enterprise infrastructure, even though you actually A sleek, brand-compliant Smartling alternative need.

Smartling too expensive? The 7 cost traps that will lead you to a Smartling alternative

1) Licensing model does not fit the content reality

Many enterprise tools pay for themselves through volume, users, workflows and add-ons. For smaller websites, this is often like a „flat rate at the stadium“ when all you want is a sandwich.

2) Translation volume is incorrectly estimated

WordPress pages have more text than you might think: menus, footers, cookie banner texts, SEO metadata, template snippets, reusable blocks. It all adds up.

3) The connector factor

As soon as a tool is connected between WordPress, the translation platform and, if applicable, other systems, costs arise due to:

  • Setup & mapping
  • Maintenance during theme/plugin updates
  • Debugging (and yes, it happens)

 

A good Smartling alternative reduces precisely this „connector pain“.

4) Process costs instead of just tool costs

An enterprise workflow sounds great – until you realise you have to operate it too. Roles, approvals, statuses, tickets. It takes time. Time costs money.

5) Brand tonality becomes a permanent work in progress

Without clear rules (glossary, tone guidelines, terminology), loops arise:

„Doesn't sound like us.“
„Please, again.“
„And again.“

A clean Smartling alternative must start right here: Tone and terminology belong in the system – not in 300 comments..

6) Translations ≠ good website experience

Many teams optimise the translation process but forget about the UX:

  • Language switch in the wrong place
  • SEO structure falls apart
  • URL logic is inconsistent
  • Duplicate content risks

 

Result: expensive to translate, but performs poorly. A Smartling alternative for WordPress must take SEO and UX into account.

7) Lock-in & fear of change

When a setup is expensive, sometimes the only reason you stick with it is because changing seems „too risky“. Spoiler alert: A well-planned change is often less dramatic than one might think.

Case: Smartling alternative in use – over £30,000 saved per year

At Superblau, we recently replaced a Smartling setup for a customer because the running costs were no longer in proportion to the benefits.

The objective was clear:

  • Massively reduce costs
  • Translations remain professional (not „Google Translate vibes“)
  • Secure brand language (Terminology & Tone)
  • Workflow suitable for everyday use for a small team

 

Result: The customer saves more than €30,000 per year. – with an integrated glossary, defined tone and a process that runs smoothly in everyday life. And most importantly, everyone is more relaxed because translations no longer feel like a separate IT project.

So if you're thinking, „Smartling is too expensive,“ yes, a Smartling alternative can pay for itself very quickly.

Checklist: Do you need a Smartling alternative?

If you can tick off two or more points, it's worth taking a look:

  • You translate a maximum of 1–3 languages, but pay enterprise prices.
  • Your website translations are only a small part of your marketing – but they eat up a large budget.
  • You have regular correction loops because terms/tonality are not right.
  • The connector constantly causes minor issues („Something's missing,“ „Why is there a duplicate?“).
  • You want to publish new landing pages quickly, but translation slows you down.
  • No one in the team really „likes“ the tool – they use it because they have to.
  • You're afraid of updates because afterwards something won't sync anymore.

 

What a Smartling alternative for WordPress must be able to do at a minimum

Not everything that is „cheaper“ is automatically good. A sensible Smartling alternative must (at least) deliver the following:

  1. WordPress-compatible workflow (editors can work without technical complications)
  2. Glossary / Terminology rules (so that „feature“ does not have 5 variants)
  3. Tone control (formal/informal, brand voice)
  4. SEO cleanliness (hreflang, metadata, clean URL structure)
  5. Scalability (new pages, new languages without rebuilding)
  6. Cost control (transparent and predictable, no „surprises at the end of the month“)

 

This is precisely where many DIY setups fail – and this is precisely why implementation (and the right construction plan) is crucial.

Superblue: Smartling Alternative Audit (30 minutes)

If you use Smartling (or a similar enterprise setup) for WordPress and find the costs strange, here's what we do:

  • Brief audit of your setup (languages, content volume, processes)
  • Identification of cost drivers
  • Rough target architecture for a Smartling alternative
  • Assessment of effort, risks and realistic savings potential

 

No sales spiel – just a clear recommendation on whether it's worth switching.

👉 Want to know if you can save five figures with a Smartling alternative?

Send us a message with the subject line ‘Smartling Alternative Audit’, We will get back to you with suggested dates.

Let's do it! 👋

As a design agency, we accompany you when design meets innovation and successful products are created. Let's create digital experiences together that leave a lasting impression!

contact now

We look forward to hearing from you. Write to us or book an appointment directly.

Select appointment directly

Book a video call with Marco Barooah-Siebertz via Microsoft Teams at your desired time

Thank you
for your message!

We will get back to you as soon as possible!

Thank you for your interest!

You will find the link to download the branding checklist in your inbox. If you have not received an email, then check please check your spam folder!

contact now

We look forward to hearing from you. Write to us or book an appointment directly.

Select appointment directly

Book a video call with Marco Barooah-Siebertz via Microsoft Teams at your desired time